» » Before the Big Bang: The Origins of the Universe
Download Before the Big Bang: The Origins of the Universe epub book
ISBN:1568580878
Author: Ernest J. Sternglass
ISBN13: 978-1568580876
Title: Before the Big Bang: The Origins of the Universe
Format: lit azw lrf mbr
ePUB size: 1265 kb
FB2 size: 1967 kb
DJVU size: 1658 kb
Language: English
Category: Physics
Publisher: Basic Books (October 23, 1997)
Pages: 208

Before the Big Bang: The Origins of the Universe by Ernest J. Sternglass



1/2 21. Personal Name: Sternglass, Ernest J. Publication, Distribution, et. New York On this site it is impossible to download the book, read the book online or get the contents of a book. The administration of the site is not responsible for the content of the site. The data of catalog based on open source database. All rights are reserved by their owners. Download book Before the big bang : the origins of the universe, by Ernest J. Sternglass.

Before Time Began: The Big Bang and the Emerging Universe. Before the Big Bang: The Prehistory of Our Universe. Little did I know that this book would change my entire view of the fabric of life and existence. You will find yourself understanding sub-atomic particle physics in a visual way that you would have never believed before

In Before the Big Bang, Sternglass conducts a brief tour of modern particle physics and cosmology. He describes how the theories of Kant, Godel, Einstein and others led to the idea of an expanding but ultimately stable, rotating universe. And he recounts his firsthand exchanges with scientific greats such as Albert Einstein, Louis de Broglie, Niels Bohr, and Richard Feynma In Before the Big Bang, Sternglass conducts a brief tour of modern particle physics and cosmology. From these two particles, everything else evolved. The universe began with a single such pair, rotating close to the speed of light - containing the entire mass of the cosmos in a volume less than a trillionth of an inch in diameter, long before the explosive formation of ordinary matter in the Big Bang.

Sternglass also wrote the book Before the Big Bang: the Origins of the Universe, in which he offers an argument for the Lemaître theory of the primeval atom. He offers technical data showing the plausibility of an original super massive relativistic electron-positron pair. This particle contained the entire mass of the universe and through a series of 270 divisions created everything that now exists. If true, this would help ameliorate some of the problems with the current models, namely inflation and black hole singularities. Ernest J. Sternglass (1981) Secret Fallout: low-level radiation from Hiroshima to Three-Mile Island. Originally published in 1972 under the title Low-Level Radiation with an introduction by Nobel Laureate George Wald. Sternglass (1997) Before the Big Bang: the origins of the universe.

In Before the Big Bang, Sternglass conducts a brief tour of modern particle physics and cosmology. And he recounts his firsthand exchanges with scientific greats such as Albert Einstein, Louis de Broglie, Niels Bohr, and Richard Feynman

A brief tour of the latest developments in astrophysics, including a discussion of the origins of the universe and the author's firsthand exchanges with Einstein. Explores the theory that one single primeval atom split and caused a huge explosion which led to a mix of neurons and protons and eventually the creation of the galaxy. ISBN13: 9781568580876. Release Date: October 1997.

Sternglass, Ernest J. Before the big bang : the origins of the universe, by Ernest J. Matter - Mathematical models.

The Universe Before the Big Bang - Cosmology and String Theory Endless Universe: Beyond the Big Bang Endless Universe: Beyond the Big Bang. The Universe Before the Big Bang: Cosmology and String Theory (Astronomers' Universe).

On a different note Dr. Sternglass has written a book called " Before the Big Bang: the Origins of the Universe ", in which he offers a compelling argument for Lemaitre ' s provocative theory of the primeval atom. He offers compelling technical data showing the plausibility of an original super massive relativistic electron - positron pair. Sternglass ( 1997 ) " Before the Big Bang: the origins of the universe ". ISBN 1 - 56858 - 087 - 8. References.

Explores the theory that one single "primeval atom" split and caused a huge explosion that led to a mix of neurons and protons, which, in turn, led to the creation of the galaxy and life as it is now known. 20,000 first printing. IP.
Reviews: 7
Brightcaster
I don't recall what inspired me to purchase this book. Probably just idle curiosity about what might have happened before the "Big Bang."
Little did I know that this book would change my entire view of the fabric of life and existence.
Written as a personal history of the author's own quest for a SIMPLE and INTUITIVE explanation of the existence and initial creation of all the matter in the universe, this modest book guides the intelligent lay reader through more than a century of experimentation and research.
You will find yourself understanding sub-atomic particle physics in a visual way that you would have never believed before. I'm only half way through the book, and already I know that the moment I complete it I'll read it again, just to better absorb this incredible book's entirety.
I can't possibly overstate the simplicity and clarity with which this author writes of his own involvement in the search for the basis of material existence and crea! tion, nor of his modesty as he so painstakingly gives credit to every other researcher in the field.
If you purchase this book, and read it, you'll come away with a grasp of sub-atomic physics like you'd never have believed you could attain.
Dakora
This book is exactly what I had been searching for. I'd wanted to try to understand the possibility of all matter emanating from one atom and finally this book explores this primal dense atom in terms I can with some difficulty understand. It is so clearly and beautifully written that the elegance of the writing makes the difficult detail a joy to read. I even chose to read it on a long transatlantic plane trip rather than watch a movie. It is that good!!!!
Felolv
My brother, poet and long-distance walker Mark "Perfesser" Creekwater, asked me to post this review for him. The "Perfesser" knows that uppercase writing is considered "shouting" on the Internet. But he has been writing in his own unique mix of upper- and lower-case words combined with punctuation marks and alternate spellings of words since before the Internet existed. He begs your indulgence, and asks that you open yourself to reading upper-case writing that is not at all a matter of shouting, but of careful word-craft.

_BEFORE THE BIG BANG_ {1997} BY ERNEST J. STERNGLASS

BOOK-REVIEW BY MARK "TRUTH-SEEKER" CREEK-WATER

DURING 2006, ASTRONOMERs OBSERVED A "SUPERNOVA" {SN2006gy}
WHICH WAS SO BIG + FAR-AWAY THAT IT WAS
REPORTED IN MANY NEWsPAPERs ... AFTER READ-ING SOME OF
THE REPORTS, I DUB'D IT A "SUPER-DUPER-NOVA" ---AS IT WAS,
EVIDENT-LY, ONE OF THE BIG-EST EVER OBSERVED ...

AS A CHILD, I WAS INTERESTED IN ASTRONOMY: BEFORE THE
AGE OF 12 I HAD READ MOST OF TH ASTRONOMY-BOOKs IN MY ELEM-
ENTARY-SCHOOL LIBRARY ... OCCASIONAL-LY, DURING TH MANY YEARs
SINCE THEN, I READ ASTRONOMY-REPORTs IN NEWsPAPERs+MAGAZINEs,
ALWAYs TRY'N TO FOLLOW NEW DISCOVERYs + DEVELOPMENTs;
REALIZE-ING THAT SOME OF TH REPORT-WRITERs HAD A WEAK UNDER-
STANDING OF SCIENCE IN GENERAL, AND/OR ASTRO-PHYSICs IN PARTICULAR,
SO IT MIGHT-BE DIFFICULT TO GET RELIABLE INFO FROM NEWsPAPERs
+MAGAZINEs; ALWAYs WONDER-ING IF TH CURRENT GENERATION OF
ASTRONOMERs + ASTRO-PHYSICISTs + COSMOLOGISTs WOULD EVER COME UP
WITH A COHERENT + BELIEVE-ABLE THEORY TO EXPLAIN HOW-THE-
UNIVERSE-CAME-TO-BE-HOW-IT-IS ...

EINSTEIN's DREAM: A "THEOTY-OF-EVERY-THING" ---ALSO-CALL'D A
"GRAND-UNIFICATION-THEORY" ... EINSTEIN CALL'D IT A "UNIFY'D-FIELD
THEORY" AND WORK'D MANY YEARs, DURING THE 2ND-HALF OF HIS LIFE,
TRY'N TO ACHIEVE IT ...

***SN2006gy***
REGARD-ING THIS NEW "SUPER-DUPER-NOVA": ALL TH REPORTs AGREED
THAT A VERY-BIG STAR -----MORE-THAN 100x BIG-ER-THAN OUR SUN-----
HAD COLLAPSED+EXPLODED, MORE-THAN 100-MILLION LIGHT-YEARs
AWAY: SO FAR-AWAY THAT IT ACTUAL-LY COLLAPSED+EXPLODED
MORE-THAN 100-MILLION YEARs AGO; BECAUSE THE LIGHT FROM ITs
COLLAPSE+EXPLOSION NEEDED MORE-THAN 100-MILLION YEARs TO
TRAVEL FROM THERE TO HERE: AT APPROX. 186,000 MILEs-PER-SECOND
[APPROX. 300,000 KILOMETERs-PER-SECOND], THAT's A VERY-LONG DISTANCE !!

IN OTHER WORDs, THIS VERY-DISTANT EVENT HAPPEN'D WHEN DINO-
SAURs ROAM'D AROUND ON OUR HOME-PLANET, AND WE ARE
JUST-RECENT-LY RECEIVE-ING THE NEWs !!

IF THIS DOES-NOT IMPRESS YOU, THEN YOU NEED TO RE-READ
THE PREVIOUS 3 PARAGRAPHs ...

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
WHAT REAL-LY GRAB'D MY ATTENTION WERE REPORTs THAT, WHEN
THIS VERY-BIG STAR COLLAPSED+EXPLODED, SPECTACULAR-LY, MUCH
OF ITs MATERIAL WAS CRUSH'D SO INTENSE-LY THAT IT MORPH'D
IN-TO ELECTRONs + POSITRONs + GAMMA-RAYs: IN PHYSICs, THESE
ARE THE EQUIVALENT OF "SMITHEREENs": EVIDENT-LY, MUCH OF THIS
STAR HAD BEEN CONVERTED TO "SMITHEREENs": UN-USUAL-LY BIG-AMOUNTs
OF POWER-FULL GAMMA-RAYs + EQUAL-LY ENERGETIC ELECTRONs +
POSITRONs ...

AT THAT TIME, I HAD ONLY A VAGUE IDEA RE WHAT "POSITRONs"
ARE, BASED ON MY CHILDHOOD READ-ING OF ASTRONOMY-BOOKs ...
THIS NEW INFO INSPIRED ME TO REALIZE [ " AHA !! " ] THAT, AT
INTENSE HEAT+PRESSURE, "POSITRONs" ARE JUST AS NATURAL AS
"ELECTRONs" ---THEIR MORE-FAMILIAR COUSINs [OR, PERHAPs,
"TWINs"] ... AHA: THO SOME-FOLKs TRY'D TO CHARACTERIZE
THEM AS "ANTI-MATTER" --- THERE's REAL-LY NOTHING-AT-ALL
"ANTI" ABOUT "POSITRONs" ...

ALL THIS NEW INFO INSPIRED ME TO WANT TO LEARN MORE,
SO I STARTED READ'N ASTRONOMY-BOOKs IN THE LIBRARYs WHERE
I WOULD GO TO CHECK MY E-MAIL ... DOZENs OF ASTRONOMY-BOOKs,
+ BOOKs RE ASTRO-PHYSICs + "REGULAR" PHYSICs + "NUCLEAR" PHYSICs,
LOOK'N FOR A CONFIRMATION OF THIS FEELING WHICH I HAD IN MY
GUT: A FEELING THAT THERE WAS SOME-THING VERY-INTEREST-ING, AND
PERHAPs VERY-SIGNIFICANT, IN THESE LITTLE ELECTRON-POSITRON PAIRS
WHICH HAD EMERGED DURING THIS SUPER-DUPER-NOVA EXPLOSION ...

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
***LOTs OF NEW INFO***
I LEARN'D RE SOME OF TH MANY NEW THINGs WHICH ASTRONOMERs
+ ASTRO-PHYSICISTS + NUCLEAR-PHYSICISTs HAVE DISCOVER'D DURING
TH PAST 50 YEARs, USE-ING POWER-FULL + SENSITIVE ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT DESIGN'D + BUILT DURING TH PAST 50 YEARs ...

PLUS: I MET SOME VERY-INTEREST-ING CHARACTERS AS I WAS READ'N
MANY BOOKs: GUYs LIKE LEE SMOLIN {_THE TROUBLE WITH PHYSICs_} +
RICHARD FEYNMAN {_SIX EASY PIECEs_} + GEORGE GAMOW {_ONE, TWO, THREE ... INFINITY_} + FRED HOYLE {_THE BLACK CLOUD_} + JOAO MAGUEIJO
{_FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT_} AND WILSON+PENZIAS, WHO {1964}
DISCOVER'D THE FAMOUS "COSMIC BACKGROUND RADIATION" ... AND MANY-
MORE "WILD+CRAZY" SCIENCE+MATH GUYs: I HAD NO IDEA THAT ASTRO-
NOMERs WERE (LIKE) SO KOOOL !!

PLUS EINSTEIN, MY FAVORITE, WHO WAS ONE OF TH SMART-EST
GUYs IN TH WHOLE-WIDE-WORLD, AND ALSO ONE OF TH NICE-EST
+ KIND-EST + MOST-COMPASSIONATE HUMANs OF TH 20TH-CENTURY ...

EVENTUAL-LY I ARRIVED IN BERKELEY (CALIFORNIA), STILL SEARCH-
ING FOR A COHERENT + BELIEVE-ABLE "THEORY OF EVERY-THING"
TO BELIEVE IN ... THERE, IN TH MAIN LIBRARY, DOWN-TOWN,
I DISCOVER'D PROFESSOR ERNEST J. STERNGLASS's BOOK:
_BEFORE THE BIG BANG_, {1997} ... SUDDEN-LY, MY SEARCH WAS OVER ...

***_BEFORE THE BIG BANG_***
PROFESSOR STERNGLASS's BOOK AMAZED ME, AND CONTINUEs TO
AMAZE ME ... TO BEGIN WITH, HE's WORK'D-OUT THE STRUCTURE
OF PROTONs ["NUCLEAR" PHYSICs], WHICH NO-BODY ELSE HAS DONE ...
AFTER READ'N HIS BOOK, I FEEL LIKE I NOW UNDERSTAND HOW
PROTONs WORK ... [HINT: THEIR PARTs ARE SMALL-ER-THAN "QUARKs"] ...
AS A LIVE-ING CREATURE WHOSE PHYSICAL-BODY IS COMPOSED, MAIN-LY,
OF PROTONs + THEIR CLOSE-COUSINs, NEUTRONs, ALONG WITH ALL OTHER
HUMANs + ANIMALs, AS WELL AS TREEs + GRASS + FLOWERs + ROCKs +
STONEs + PEBBLEs, + ALL THE KINDs OF METALs, + POTs + PANs +
KETTLEs ---(ALL, LIKE MY-SELF, COMPOSED MAIN-LY OF PROTONs+NEUTRONs)---
THIS IS (LIKE) A VERY-GOOD FEELING ...

PLUS: IN ADDITION TO THIS "NUCLEAR" PHYSICs, PROFESSOR STERN-
GLASS's BOOK ALSO EXPLAINs "REGULAR" PHYSICs + "ASTRO" PHYSICs:
ALL IN A WAY WHICH I CAN UNDERSTAND, AND WHICH MAKES SENSE
TO ME: AS A LIFE-LONG TRUTH-SEEKER, THIS GIVEs TO ME
A VERY-KOOOL FEELING ...

AND IT CONFIRM'D THE GUT-FEELING WHICH I MENTION'D EARLY-ER:
ACCORDING TO STERNGLASS's THEORY, PROTONs + NEUTRONs +
ALL OTHER KINDs OF "MATTER" ARE ULTIMATE-LY COMPOSED OF
NOTHING BUT DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONs OF ELECTRONs +
POSITRONs ... A BREATH-TAKE-ING THEORETICAL BREAK-THROUGH !!

IF YOU GO TO www.AMAZON.com, YOU CAN PURCHASE
THIS WONDER-FULL BOOK, _BEFORE THE BIG BANG_ BY ERNEST
J. STERNGLASS ... PLUS, YOU CAN READ ANY OR ALL OF MORE-
THAN A DOZEN REVIEWs OF IT, BY AMAZON-CUSTOMERs ...
I LIKE ONE IN PARTICULAR, WHICH I WILL PARA-PHRASE:
IT's BY MATTHEW J. ARNDT, POSTED 1-OCTOBER-2001:

***DETAILs RE STERNGLASS's THEORY***
# MATTER IS MADE UP OF ELECTRON-POSITRON PAIRs:
THESE 2 OPPOSITE-LY-CHARGED "PARTICLEs" ORBIT AROUND
EACH OTHER AT ALMOST-THE-SPEED-OF-LIGHT ...
# ELECTRONs + POSITRONs + PHOTONs [I.E., LIGHT] ARE VERY-TINY
+ VERY-POWER-FULL VORTEXs, LIKE MINIATURE TORNADOs;
SO "MATTER" AND "ENERGY" ARE VISUAL-LY COMPREHENSIBLE AS
2 FORMs OF THE SAME THING, AS PER EINSTEIN's E = MC**2 ...
IN THIS WAY, THE GULF BETWEEN CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM
PHYSICs EVAPORATEs ...

# PROTONs ARE MADE UP OF 4 ELECTRON-POSITRON PAIRs,
PLUS 1 POSITRON, INTER-ACT-ING IN SUCH A WAY (ILLUSTRATED
ON PAGE 250) AS TO ACCOUNT FOR:
(1) THE SO-CALL'D "STRONG NUCLEAR FORCE" ...
(2) THE UN-EQUAL'D STABILITY OF PROTONs ...
(3) THE PROPERTYs + CHARACTERISTICs OF
THEORETICAL "QUARKs" (WHICH HAVE NEVER BEEN OBSERVED) ...
NEUTRONs AND THE SO-CALL'D "WEAK NUCLEAR FORCE" ARE
SIMILAR-LY EXPLAIN'D ...
# ELECTRON-POSITRON PAIRs ALLOW FOR MORE-MASSIVE
AND LONGER-LIVED PARTICLEs THAN ANY OTHER KNOWN
FORM OF MATTER ... STERNGLASS SAYs THAT THERE IS NO LIMIT TO
THE AMOUNT OF ENERGY WHICH A PAIR OF THESE LITTLE RASCALs
CAN ABSORB ... ASTONISH-ING-LY, THIS ALLOWs FOR A SINGLE
ELECTRON-POSITRON PAIR TO HAVE ENCOMPASS'D THE ENTIRE
MASS/ENERGY OF THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE, BEFORE THE BIG BANG
STARTED ... THIS ELIMINATEs THE NEED TO STIPULATE A MATHEMATIC-
LY-IMPOSSIBLE INFINITE-LY-DENSE "SINGULARITY" AT THE START OF
THE BIG BANG ...
# ALL COSMOLOGICAL STRUCTUREs ["ASTRO" PHYSICs],
FROM THE UNIVERSE IT-SELF, DOWN TO STARs + PLANETs,
ARE ROTATE-ING SYSTEMs, EQUAL-LY-SPACED ON
LOGARITHMIC SCALEs OF BOTH MASS AND SIZE ...
THIS STRUCTURE, UN-ACCOUNT-ABLE BY ANY PREVIOUS
THEORY, WAS PRE-EXIST-ING IN THE
EXTRA-ORDINARILY DENSE SEED-OF-THE-UNIVERSE, [THE
ORIGINAL ELECTRON-POSITRON PAIR, WHICH STERNGLASS CALLs
"THE PRIMEVAL ATOM"], BEFORE THE BIG BANG ...
# BEFORE THE BIG BANG, THIS SEED-OF-THE-UNIVERSE
DIVIDED BY TWO [I.E., DIVIDED IN HALF] IN A SERIES OF STAGEs,
MANY TIMEs, SMALL-ER + SMALL-ER + SMALL-ER, UNTIL IT
REACH'D THE SIZE OF ORDINARY SUB-ATOMIC PARTICLEs,
AT WHICH POINT IT EXPLODED VIOLENT-LY OUT-WARD-LY,
PRODUCE-ING THE BIG BANG ...

PLUS: STERNGLASS's BOOK REVEALS MUCH MORE ...
I AGREE WITH SEVERAL OTHER FOLKs WHO REVIEW'D HIS
BOOK: I RECKON THAT IT's ONLY "A MATTER OF TIME
BEFORE STERNGLASS IS HAIL'D AS A [21ST-CENTURY] GALILEO" ...

AS A PROTON-BASED LIFE-FORM, I RECOMMEND IT TO ALL OTHER
PROTON-BASED LIFE-FORMs; AND TO ANY-BODY WHO SINCERE-LY
WONDERs (LIKE) HOW DID WE GET HERE ?? OR, HOW DID THE
UNIVERSE GET HERE ?? OR, (LIKE), HOW DID
ALL THIS HAPPEN ???

SINCERE-LY,
MARK "TRUTH-SEEKER" CREEK-WATER DORAZIO
[...]
BERKELEY-CA-USA 9-SEPTEMBER-2009
salivan
Dr Sternglass' challanging text promises, subject to emperical confirmation, to break new ground in particle physics. For his model of the original or primeval atom, if sound, (and no theory should be ruled out of court without the consideration of the best cognoscendi of the discipline of physics subjecting it to rigorous scientific analysis. Why? Because the theory promises to allow us to uncover, at last, the relationship between celestial phenomena and the quantum theory; it will allow physcists of the future to potentially provide the deep Logico-emperical connection of matter both at the galactic and quantum scales. Thus the theory may show the way toward the unity of nature. As I implied many parameters within the Standard Model are emperically derived; therefore, there is a need to probe for the logical nexus which generates just these numbers, say, that of the fine-structure constant or the size of an electron, or the proportion or ratio of electron mass to the mass of the nuclei: All of these measures are emperical today, if I understand what the best physicists have said about the matter. If Dr. Weinberg is right in saying that we need to better understand quantum theory, then what better way to begin than by seeking to disprove the theory of Sternglass, or more accurately, attempt to show that it is inconsistent with known emperical data derived from the Standard Model;even if it passes all consistency tests, that is not the end of the matter-more analysis is required. The model has also the virtue of making an exact prediction-the Higgs particle will not be discovered. So, if it is discovered, the quark-structure will prove to be more complicated than the simple two-particle theory implies. For a method of showing that these particles are a good candidate for the ultimate particles or atoms, to recur to the ancient theories of Democritus and Leucippus, see the work of Brian Stedjee ([...] which tends to support Sternglass' chosen candidates; Stedjee has developed a sive method for sorting out or hunting the primitive particle from looking at sub-atomic decay processes and their byproducts: I have relied on his work in furthering my own work in particle theory, which posits the neutrino as the most fundamental particle; I predict a tripartite structure, consisting of an electron, a positron, both tightly bound by the jacketing neutrino, and that the proton is composed of these particles: To what degree there are further correspondences in the theories is unknown to me, and I do not wish to get Dr. Sternglass' theory confused with my own. First of all, Dr. Sternglass' theory is a mathematical theory, and he has made the emperical measurements to the degree that he can to show why the theory has evidential support; my theory, by contrast, may be an extension of Sternglass' but it is not the same, for Dr. Sternglass does not make the neutrino the centerpiece of his model. And he does not offer reflections on the relationship between the electrodynamics of hydrogen and the Riemann hypothesis as I do, or he does not explicitly do so; based on phone conversations with Dr. Sternglass I discerned that he thought there was an equivalence between his model and a cosmological black hole;so he and I agree that the black hole or rotating sphere of the universe is generated from these two particles and their highly relativistic motion; I have suggested that the Chandraskar limit value is the state of matter-mass/energy-that precedes or causes the four fundamental forces to come into being as its rotation slows; in Sternglass' model a sixteen trillion year period powers the primeval atom and produces the big bang;in my model this would be the period of time when the atom would wind-up and the electron energy would reach maximum potential, then differentiate into the four forces; the state would have to conform to some descriptions of super-conductivity, wherein the four forces became merely one, possibly gravity. Sternglass' proposal has another merit: It allows us to closely investigate a proposal made by the Father of relativised quantum mechanics, Paul Dirac; Dirac noticed that there was a not quite random (as a scientist with good intuitions, Dirac supposed there to be a profound truth behind this phenomenon) proportionality between small scale cosmic measurements and the solar system and so on up the galactic scale of matter. By postulating a primeval atom which ejects galaxies in serial divisions, Sternglass may be unto this deep truth, and science and physics may be altered by this element. Although Sternglass does not explicitly mention Dirac's conjecture, one cannot help but making the connection, once one sees that the primeval (Lamattreian) atom as a continuous process of galactic ejection. For these reasons, therefore, Dr. Sternglass' text should be taken seriously, if we want to better understand quantum mechanics;he gives us a paradigmatic, if not yet paradigm-shift-inducing, model, reasons for accepting it, and the scientific measurements and analysis which he hopes will be taken up at some future time by a scientist or scientists.The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (International Series of Monographs on Physics)Lectures on Quantum MechanicsModern Physics and Vedanta