» » Speaking the Truth: Zionism, Israel, and Occupation
Download Speaking the Truth: Zionism, Israel, and Occupation epub book
Author: Michael Prior,Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu
ISBN13: 978-1566565776
Title: Speaking the Truth: Zionism, Israel, and Occupation
Format: txt lrf rtf azw
ePUB size: 1730 kb
FB2 size: 1461 kb
DJVU size: 1633 kb
Language: English
Category: Politics and Government
Publisher: Interlink Books (September 1, 2004)
Pages: 254

Speaking the Truth: Zionism, Israel, and Occupation by Michael Prior,Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu

Zionism History Moral and ethical aspects Jewish-Arab relations. On this site it is impossible to download the book, read the book online or get the contents of a book. The administration of the site is not responsible for the content of the site. The data of catalog based on open source database. All rights are reserved by their owners.

Contributor(s): Prior, Michael. Material type: BookPublisher: Northampton, MA : Olive Branch Press, 2005. Description: 254 p. ; 22 c. SBN: 1566565774 (pb. Subject(s): Zionism - History Ziomism - Moral and ethical aspects Jewish-Arab relations - History Israel - HistoryDDC classification: 32. 4095694.

Speaking the Truth book. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Start by marking Speaking the Truth: Zionism, Israel, and Occupation as Want to Read: Want to Read savin. ant to Read.

In the same year, Archbishop Tutu received an International Advocate for Peace Award from the Cardozo School of Law, an affiliate of Yeshiva University, sparking scattered student protests and condemnations from representatives of the Simon Wiesenthal Center and Anti-Defamation League. A 2006 opinion piece in the Jerusalem Post newspaper described him as "a friend, albeit a misguided one, of Israel and the Jewish people". The Zionist Organization of America has led a campaign to protest Tutu's appearances at North American campuses. ed. Speaking the Truth: Zionism, Israel, and Occupation. p. 12. ↑ 1. 1. "Tutu Urges Jews to Forgive The Nazis".

Desmond Tutu: Israel has created an apartheid reality. Joseph Wanyama/Flickr). As the Presbyterian Church USA holds its 2014 general assembly in Detroit from 14-21 June, Archbishop Emeritus of Cape Town Desmond Tutu has issued this call on delegates to vote in favor of divestment from companies that assist apartheid Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian people: As the Presbyterian General Assembly gathers for its biennial meeting, I reach out in prayer and solidarity that the Assembly will make a strong witness for reconciliation, justice and peace.

A collection of essays by other authors. Ateek, Naim, and Prior, Michael, Holy land, hollow jubilee: God, justice, and the Palestinians, Melisende, 1999. Macpherson, Duncan, "Professor Michael Prior - Controversial priest and theologian who was an outspoken supporter of Palestinian rights" (Obituary), in The Independent, August 23, 2004. Oestreicher, Paul, "Father Michael Prior - Liberation theologian passionately committed to the Palestinian cause", (Obituary), in The Guardian, 6 August 2004, online.

Letter from Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu. As US citizens you have the responsibility to speak truth to the power of your own government. As Christians you have the duty to side with the oppressed and by so doing to liberate the oppressor. God bless you. Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu Cape Town, South Africa. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies or position of Atlanta Black Star or its employees.

Archbishop Emeritus Tutu. Photo: Flickr/Port of San Diego. Today we celebrate the birth of a living South African icon, retired cleric and anti-apartheid activist Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu. Tutu was born in Klerksdorp, Transvaal, in 1931. The Arch, as Tutu is affectionately known was the first black Archbishop of Cape Town and bishop of the Church of the Province of Southern Africa (now the Anglican Church of Southern Africa). The Arch has remained resolute and critical in speaking on fundamental issues on governance, human rights, HIV/Aids, poverty, and social justice issues. We salute this African hero, tirelessly working in pursuit of peace and justice. If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.

In this collection of original essays, 12 internationally respected scholars and experts (IIan Pappe, Rosemary Ruether, Betsy Barlow, Naseer Aruri and others) examine the ethical and strategic issues of the Palestine-Israel conflict, and offer us a rare window into the realities behind Israel's military occupation.
Reviews: 4
because the book was written from a purely Christian standpoint, and I did not expect that because I expected a different viewpoint
When the South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu paid his first visit to Palestine, he was shocked by the similarities between his former Apartheid South Africa and the dismal situation under which occupied Palestinians have been living since the establishment of the State of Israel. In his foreword to this outstanding collection of essays, written by 12 internationally respected scholars and experts, he stated: "Now, alas, we see apartheid in Israel, complete with the `Separation Wall` and Bantustans that keep Palestinians rounded up in prisons. History tragically repeats itself. Yet, injustice and oppression will never prevail."

What makes these essays important and overly worth reading is the fact that several are dealing with the ineffable role played not only by a certain brand of Christianity in their religiously dressed up rhetoric but also especially the juggernaut of the so-called Christian Zionists who are playing an infamous role in legitimizing every action of this dehumanizing occupation enterprise. For example, late reverend Michael Prior challenges in his essay "Zionism and the challenge of historical truth and morality" the "canonical secular Zionist narrative" and the "canonical religious Zionist narrative" head-on. Although the injustices committed by the Zionist colonizer in the course of the establishment of the State of Israel are historically well known and documented, they had been "passed over in much Western discourse. Indeed, in some religious circles the Zionist enterprise is even clothed in the garment of piety (...) Whereas elsewhere the perpetrators of colonial plunder are objects of opprobrium, the Zionist conquest is widely judged to be a just and appropriate accomplishment, with even unique religious significance." (33/34) According to Prior, the answers to this opinion lay in the bible and its religious authority.

The "ironclad" support by the West of Israel's colonial endeavor is not only propagated among secular lobbyists but is also rooted in the "link between the Bible and Zionism" that is deeply established in the popular mind, writes Prior. Although, biblical research shows no evidence in support of the claim that the Bible provides legitimacy to the "canonical" Zionist narrative for the State of Israel, it seems as if for some Christian sects and the Christian-Jewish dialogue groups the removal of the indigenous people becomes an "object of honor". "It is in the unique case of Zionism that ethnic cleansing is applauded. It would be a pity if mutually respected Jewish-Christian relations demanded the suspension of the moral rules of a universalist morality." (44)

The political and religious intensions of Christian Zionists and the policy of the International Christian Embassy" (ICEJ) in Jerusalem are revealed by author Vicar Stephen Sizer. The ICEJ is probably the most influential and controversial among Christian Zionist institutions. It is located close to the Israeli Prime Minister's office. Ironically, this "embassy's" building had originally been the home of the family of the late Edward W. Said, before being confiscated in 1948 when it was first given to Martin Buber, the Jewish philosopher. The ICEJ goes with Israel's colonial land grab policy in occupied Palestine through thick and thin. Admittedly, it has disavowed preaching the gospel among Jews, in part for pragmatic reasons, since this ensures the support of the political establishment in Israel. Beyond that, it opposes criticism of Israel's policy towards the Palestinians. ICEJ's strange theological interpretation of the Bible does not make missionary work necessary because the ICEJ believes that once the Jewish nation is restored to the Land of Israel, the Jews will collectively acknowledge the Christian Messiah when he returns, writes Sizer. How "sophisticated" the Christian Zionist's intentions are, is shown in an interview with its founder, Jan Willam van der Hoeven, in the "Jerusalem Post" concerning the "covert" Christian missionary. Van der Hoeven denied that ICEJ engages in missionary work and conversion but added: "The Jewish religion must modify itself in the course of time - but on one point only, the identity of the Messiah (...) they must make the modification as a collective entity." Although, the U. S. American and Israeli political establishments probably realize that this position is in fact "anti-Semitic" they closely cooperate with the ICEJ according to the motto: "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." Concluding his article, Sizer writes: "The ICEJ, it appears, is a sectarian, pseudo-Christian organization of dispensational origin which has unconditionally endorsed contemporary political Israel as the exclusive fulfillment of God's promises and purposes made under the Old Covenant."

For another author, the Reverend Peter J. Miano, the main problems are not "Jewish Zionists" but "Christian Zionists". Before there were Jewish Zionists, there were Christian ones. "For every Jewish Zionist, there are at least ten Christian Zionists." (126) Miano`s article is especially useful because it makes an important distinction between fundamentalist and mainstream Christian Zionism. Where the first is a bizarre and obscure ideology, the later is very well established in the halls of the U. S. Congress, the churches, the Christian academia and the biblical academies.

The fundamentalist Christian Zionist doctrine sees the establishment of the State of Israel as the fulfillment of biblical prophecy occurring in the end time. Accordingly, God has a special role for the Jewish people in their covenanted land, and Christian devotion to God requires support for God's plan of salvation. This religious mythology is being actualized in modern-day Israel. For this special brand of "Christians", the violence associated with the State of Israel and its victims, the Palestinians, is not understood as a struggle between colonizer and colonized, but as necessary birth pangs of a new eschatological age. The struggle between Israelis and Palestinians is interpreted in apocalyptic terms as part of a broader struggle between the forces of good and evil. The final battle will take place on the plain of Armageddon. (129)

On the other hand, mainstream Christian Zionism is "far more pervasive, fare more mercurial and far more pernicious. It is also much more difficult to expose and critique," (130) Because Christian Zionists outnumber Jewish Zionists by some one hundred to one, it makes the success of the Zionist agenda much easier to understand, writes Miano. All brands of Zionism possess, however, two characteristics in common: the establishment of the Jewish State of Israel is both a moral imperative and a political necessity. (134) It seems to the reader as if mainstream Christian Zionists resemble the so-called Israeli Zionist Left: They often oppose the Israeli policies in the Palestinian Occupied Territories but they do not mind the violence that took place during the 1948 war. They often recognize the legitimate demands of the Palestinian people for justice even while rationalizing Jewish nationalism by appeal to justice and morality. In addition, mainstream Christian Zionists display no regard for the plight of the Palestinians while staunchly advocating solidarity with the suffering endured by Jews. These wishy-washy Christians pervade "one of the most hallowed precincts of liberal, mainstream Christianity, namely the Jewish-Christian dialogue". (142) According to the author, this in-group revolves around themselves and is hardly concerned with the suffering of the Palestinians who "experience Zionism as an instrument of catastrophe." The focus of attention should shift, according to Miano, from the fundamentalist Christian Zionists to mainstream Christian Zionism.

Besides these refreshing articles on the destructive role played by some brands of Christianity in support the Zionist conquest of Palestine, the anthology includes articles by Ilan Pappé, Daniel McGowan, Naseer Aruri, Betsy Barlow, Paul Eisen and others who describe the historical and political implications of the Zionist colonial enterprise for the Palestinian people. The two essays on the meaning of the massacre of Deir Yassin are impressive. For example, Daniel McGowan writes: "Remembering Deir Yassin is for Palestinians what remembering the massacre at Kelcie is for Jews." (103) On April 9, 1948 a massacre by two Jewish factions, Irgun and the Stern Gang, was committed in a small village on the west side of Jerusalem, only a stone's throw away from Yad Vashem, Israel's Holocaust Memorial. The murderers of Irgun and Stern Gang had herded women, children, and the old man into the village school in order to massacre them. This envisaged atrocity was prevented by unarmed Jewish settlers from the adjacent settlement Giv'at Sha'ul. They faced down the murderers of Irgun and Stern Gang and demanded that the lives of the victims be spared. "The true Judaism of these brave people outweighed the extreme Zionism witnessed earlier that fateful day." (93)

In order to reach a kind of fair agreement between the Israeli and the Palestinian peoples the political cocoon, in which the Zionist mythology is woven in, has to be dissolved. In this endeavor, the Christians can do their bit. They have to shed their self-portrayal of the "Beautiful Israel" or the "light onto the nations" rhetoric and see what Israel really is: a brutal occupying power for the last 45 years that has nothing to do with religion, let alone with redemption. The articles in this book support the thesis that the Hebrew Bible debunks the `"canonical" Zionist narrative according to which the Bible provides legitimization for the State of Israel. This claim should pull the rug under the feet of all religious Israel fans. And the secular ones should concentrate on historical facts and not on Zionist fairy-tales. The essay in the book give both groups plenty of arguments at hand to argue for justice and the right of self-determination of the oppressed Palestinian people. All essays are very worth reading.

Dr. Ludwig Watzal works as a journalist and editor in Bonn, Germany.
I am impressed with the collection of writers in this description of how Zionism plays an unfortunate role in the perpetuation of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine. It is quite a tribute to Michael Prior that he gathered this group of respected and influential Americans, Europeans, and Middle East natives, including academics and theologians, who have moral convictions on why this occupation needs to end now, and why. Details of history are presented, moral clarifications on Israeli relations with the UN, that all put together, paint a broader picture of the conflict that most Americans have never been given. If you are wondering why the need for the end of this occupation is imperative now, this is your source.

Once you have read it and agree with its perspective, you will be in the company of Albert Eistein, Ghandi, Noam Chomsky, and other intellectual role models who have warned against a one-race state. This book clarifies the contradictions being set by Israeli efforts that truly oppose our American values.
Truth is an inherent value. But when I speak the truth, I don't boast of it. I simply tell people that it is they, not I, who must judge the validity of what I say. And that they need to verify what they hear, whether it is from me or from anyone else.

These authors have more than a little nerve when they say they are speaking the truth. Of course, most of what they say isn't true at all.

Desmond Tutu leads off with a vicious introduction. Tutu was all in favor of human rights in South Africa. But he sure isn't in favor of human rights in the Levant. And he's opposed to human rights for Levantine Jews.

Michael Prior writes about the challenge of historical truth and morality. Well, what he writes clearly shows that this challenge is far too much for him. And the Reuthers are simply more of the same.

Ilan Pappe is next, and he says that the Israelis are in "denial." Actually, I think Israelis typically have a very good knowledge of the history of their region, maybe better than almost any other group in the world. But even if many Israelis had some misconceptions about their history, what relevance would that have?

Then we get to Daniel McGowan, who writes about Deir Yassin. I think this battle was indeed a key victory in the struggle for human rights, on a par with Gettysburg or Stalingrad. It was ugly, as over a hundred people died. But that was a small number when you compare it with Stalingrad. Or Gettysburg.

Ask yourselves if you wish the Germans had won at Stalingrad and just kept winning after that. It would have made hash of Soviet Russia. But at the cost of having all of Europe under a terrible and arbitrary tyranny. Stalingrad wasn't pretty, but it was a battle which had a good result for our species as a whole. And Deir Yassin wasn't pretty either. But it was one of the first battles in which the Jews actually fought back in their war for survival. And while the Jews may not have needed to win at Deir Yassin any more than the Russians needed to win at Stalingrad, eventually both sides needed to win somewhere or condemn quite a few people to misery.

That's not the picture we get from McGowan, who treats Deir Yassin as a Jewish war crime! As far as I am concerned, what he writes is simply pro-terrorist propaganda. While I certainly do not insist that he applaud Deir Yassin, I think he ought to admit that many good people do applaud it and for good reason. And I do insist that what he does say about Deir Yassin be honest. After all, didn't the title of the book say something about truth?

The rest of the book is no better. There are some articles on Christians in the region which make everyone look bad. There's an article by Paul Eisen, who wants to speak the truth to the Jews. The truth would indeed be a good idea! Too bad he doesn't do it. Naseer Aruri then discusses the Arab "right of return." More arbitrariness, more disregard for human rights. What's next? Maybe an explanation of why the Arabs have a right to "return" to Spain and expel the Spanish?

Elizabeth Barlow says that we need the will to act. I thought about what would happen if we took her advice, and the implicit advice of the other authors. Perhaps if we all did that, we'd wind up getting rid of our whole species, once and for all.

What we need instead of books like this one is the placing of more value on truth, justice, and human rights.