|Author:||H. Li,A. Yeung|
|Title:||New Essays in Applied Ethics: Animal Rights, Personhood, and the Ethics of Killing|
|Format:||lit mbr azw lrf|
|ePUB size:||1687 kb|
|FB2 size:||1502 kb|
|DJVU size:||1714 kb|
|Publisher:||Palgrave Macmillan; 2007 edition (October 11, 2007)|
Includes bibliographical references and index. Personal Name: Li, Hon-Lam. Personal Name: Yeung, Anthony. On this site it is impossible to download the book, read the book online or get the contents of a book. The administration of the site is not responsible for the content of the site. The data of catalog based on open source database. All rights are reserved by their owners.
New Essays in Applied Ethics: Animal Rights, Personhood, and the Ethics of Killing, Palgrave McMillan, 2007) Kai-Yee Wong The Chinese University of Hong Kong. 1. Introduction In 1996, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal of United States ruled that a Washington law banning physician-assisted suicide was unconstitutional. In the same year, the 2nd Circuit found a similar law in New York unconstitutional. One year later, the . Supreme Court reversed both rulings, saying that there was no constitutional right to assisted suicide
New Essays in Applied Ethics: Animal Rights, Personhood, and the Ethics of Killing. This is a book that collects essays written by Peter Singer, Gerald Dworkin, Jenny Teichman, James Lenman, Hon-Lam Li, Kai-yee Wong, and others. Like Nagel and many others, Don Marquis favors the thesis that the badness of death – and thus the wrongness of killing can be explained by a harm of deprivation: death is an evil because it deprives one of a valuable future of experiences.
New Essays in Applied Ethics: Animal Rights, Personhood and the Ethics of Killing. A. Yeung & H. Li (ed. - 2007 - Palgrave McMillan. R. G. Frey; Animals and Why They Matter. Mary Midgley; The Case for Animal Rights. Alan Soble - 1985 - Ethics 96 (1):192-. Rights, Killing, and Suffering. Frey, Mary Midgley & Tom Regan - 1985 - Ethics 96 (1):192-195
New Essays in Applied Ethics: Animal Rights, Personhood, and the Ethics of Killing fb2 free download The Transit of Venus: The Quest to Find the True Distance of the Sun epub.
That means that a new book by Professor Varner will be received with considerable interest. The applied ethicists will find the kind of systematic application of his theory to questions about personhood and the moral status of animals that Hare himself never undertook. Although dictionaries seldom include other examples of family three definitions, readers familiar with the philosophical literatures on animal ethics and abortion will be familiar with the other examples given in table . These philosophical definitions of person are, like the legal definition, normative rather than descriptive.
In 2013, the Nonhuman Rights Project, an animal rights legal organization, petitioned New York courts on behalf of four chimpanzees. The filings argued that the chimps had a legal right to personhood, and therefore deserved to be freed. The three cases were repeatedly rejected or thrown out in lower courts. In 2017, the NRO announced it would appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals. The Future of Animal Testing.
Many think doing animal ethics demands we see moral humanism as a speciesist prejudice of the kind found with sexism and racism. Animal rights and the values of nonhuman life. In C. Sunstein & M. Nussbaum (Ed., Animal rights: Current debates and new directions (pp. 277–298). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Environmental Values, 7, 151–163. CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
The question of what constitutes personhood is involved in the debates concerning practical ethics. Metaethics plays a role in applied ethics, too, as it examines where moral principles come from and what they mean. This Preface is divided into two sections. That the Christian Bible, both Old and New Testaments, is an inadequate source for a genuine moral theory has been noted so often that to repeat it seems gratuitous. However, at present people the world over are reading the Bible, in one translation or another, and many of them believe the Bible is inerrant.